(see fig.1) |
“Le Voyage dans la Lune”
(see fig.2) |
Whether it be from the
unsuspecting men sleeping on the moon as anthropomorphic stars (Is that Gemini,
perhaps?) drift by or that umbrellas can turn into mushrooms simply by placing
them on the ground, you are left feeling a certain joy.
The playful nature of this
film, if on purpose by Méliès almost makes a mockery out of any scientific
values at the time and even now. Rather, Méliès does not try to make concepts
out of thin air, instead taking inspiration from what has already been created
and using it to its advantage. Because of this it makes great satire in a coy
way.
Being a silent film you have
to ask the question, would it be better
with sound? To that I would say no.
The overly exaggerated actions and stylized nature of the film (The former
being conform to the time) perfectly communicate what is going on and emote
that innate charm I had mentioned previously. It leaves the comedy to the
viewer to pick up yet if missed by some still holds masses of spontaneous
imagery and amusement.
Similarly to sound you have
to wonder if A Trip to the Moon was recreated with CG would the same level of
delight still be apparent throughout it? A fight scene with close range
motions, explosions and flashy time lapses turning a simple brawl into a
long-drawn out war with blood and gore; personally there is only so far you can
go with throwing Michael Bay into the mix without ruining the tone and
personality in a film. Sometimes one line can be more pleasing than 50
multi-coloured seizure-inducing ones.
There is no doubt that this film has become an inspiration for many, many people, and what is even more interesting is that across many languages and cultures as well. “Méliès gave film a new fictional function” (Parkinson, n.d.) – and whilst it certainly doesn’t boast an elaborate ‘pataphysical existence, (More on this in the next review) doing so could perhaps alienate what should instead be seen as comparative values to what is considered Meta. As mentioned previously, the use of no sound or rather lack of opens the door to interpretation and more importantly, viewership, on a much wider scale.
(see fig.5) |
(see fig.6) |
Le Voyage dans la Lune; joy and wonder at the forefront of experimentation
with what was available at the time of making this short film; coupled with
implied social commentary turned satirical making it interesting to say the
least no matter what way you decide to watch it.
“Each image just another piece of magic that you can’t figure out.” (The
Film Reel, 2011)
References:
Axmaker, S.
(2012). seanax.com » Cinema Landmark: ‘A Trip to the Moon’ Restored. [online]
Seanax.com. Available at:
http://www.seanax.com/2012/04/11/cinema-landmark-a-trip-to-the-moon-restored/
[Accessed 24 Sep. 2014].
Parkinson, D.
(n.d.). Empireonline Reviews | Reviews | Empire. [online] empireonline.com.
Available at: http://www.empireonline.com/reviews/reviewcomplete.asp?FID=134388
[Accessed 24 Sep. 2014].
The Film
Reel, (2011). A Trip To The Moon (1902) - Film Reel Reviews - The Film Reel.
[online] Available at: http://www.the-filmreel.com/2011/02/25/a-trip-to-the-moon-1902-film-reel-reviews/
[Accessed 24 Sep. 2014].
Illustration References:
Figure 1. Méliès,
G. (1902). Le voyage dans la lune poster. [image] Available at:
http://www.movieposterdb.com/posters/12_04/1902/417/l_417_f966cf1b.jpg
[Accessed 24 Sep. 2014].
Figure 2. Méliès,
G. (1902). Le Voyage dans la Lune - Film Still (1). [image] Available at:
http://puu.sh/bMbJG/d79176ad21.png [Accessed 24 Sep. 2014].
Figure 3. Méliès,
G. (1902). A Trip to the Moon, Moon. [image] Available at:
http://www.moma.org/collection_images/resized/954/w500h420/CRI_73954.jpg
[Accessed 24 Sep. 2014].
Figure 4. Square
Enix, (2004). Soul Eater, Moon. [image] Available at:
http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20131017122831/souleater/images/f/f6/Dark_moon_from_soul_eater_by_maxua1-d34f72g.png
[Accessed 24 Sep. 2014].
Figure 5. Toei
Company, (1973). [image] Available at:
http://img.ffffound.com/static-data/assets/6/5842bc6c0b77a8bcf0df1eb423b62f350a092c14_m.jpg
[Accessed 24 Sep. 2014].
Figure 6. Méliès, G. (1902). Aliens. [image] Available at: http://puu.sh/bMqxL/d7f318f6bc.png [Accessed 24 Sep. 2014].
Figure 6. Méliès, G. (1902). Aliens. [image] Available at: http://puu.sh/bMqxL/d7f318f6bc.png [Accessed 24 Sep. 2014].
*personally there is only so far you can go with throwing Michael Bay into the mix without ruining the tone and personality in a film*
ReplyDeleteMichael Bay = :(
Good to see this done and dusted - and approached so thoughtfully. So a couple of pointers to take forwards: I uploaded a 'do's and dont's' guide on the group blog which I hope you've had a chance to browse and absorb - one of the principles is avoid generalisations, for example:
*There is no doubt that this film has become an inspiration for many, many people* - now, while this is true, this statement is actually a generalisation; firstly you suggest that categorically there is 'no doubt' and then you go on to say that it has inspired 'many, many people' - the problem here is that in academic, evidence-based writing, you need to avoid generalisations. Unless you've surveyed the entire world on whether or not the film has indeed inspired 'many, many people', you can't say 'there is no doubt'. What you can do is evidence the idea of its importances by finding a published source that attests to its influence on filmmakers - don't assert it's influence on your say so, prove it on the combined say-so of others. Use quotes proactively in this way - to scaffold and lend authority to your observations.
Good to see you knitting between the film and its visual influences in other forms of entertainment.
Oh gosh, I completely overlooked the do's and dont's guide. I must have been too distracted by the creative partnerships list.
DeleteThank you for the feedback. I must admit my conscience was thinking "There is no doubt that this film has become an inspiration for many, many people" was a cop-out way to address a large portion of viewers in a short time. Time to brush the dust off and get back into the swing of backing up statements with evidence properly!
Hi Ella!
ReplyDeleteHa, Phil has beaten me to it :)
I really enjoyed reading this review, and would go along with what Phil has suggested and have another look at the do's and don'ts guide. As well as avoiding the generalisations, also try and avoiding using 'I'... you don't do it very often in this piece, but when you do, it takes it away from being objective and it becomes subjective. So for example you say 'After seeing the famous image of the moon with a face I had immediately started to see references from many other films and animations,' which could easily be changed to 'After seeing the famous image of the moon with a face, one can immediately start to see references from many other films and animations.'
Just a couple of other minor pointers...always make sure that your film names are italicised; this becomes important when you are dealing with a character name as a film title, such as King Kong - you can end up with some very odd sounding sentences otherwise! :)
Also, make sure that you link your images to the text, so for example, say 'The first notable one being the Moon from Soul Eater. – Soul Eater being Japanese(fig 4). This avoids any confusion when you have multiple images.
Looking forward very much to your next review!
Thank you for the feedback, I'm glad you enjoyed it!
DeleteI was wondering as I read over the review why it sounded slightly unprofessional and off. I had the mindset of "drive it into the viewer's head that I'm confident with what I believe so it's convincing" but I was probably approaching it in a very "English essay" type of way. - Rather than a review. I'll act on what you've said for my next review, thank you!